• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

RiversideAndBeyond.com

Go. See. Do. Riverside and Beyond

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Go. See. Do.
    • Hiking Spots
    • Volleyball Open Gyms
    • BMX Tracks
    • Shooting / Gun Ranges
    • Golf Courses
    • Skate Parks
    • Events
    • Places to Eat in Riverside And Beyond
  • Categories
    • Animals and Nature
    • Business and Jobs
    • Food and Entertainment
    • Government and Politics
    • Health and Fitness
    • Motors and Transit
    • People
    • Random Sights and Stories
    • Resources and Technology
  • Social Media
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Pinterest
  • Subscribe
  • Online Since 2009
  • Riverside, CA

Government

Two Riverside County Hazardous Waste Facilities Expanding Hours in 2017

December 28, 2016 by Ole Leave a Comment

The Riverside County Department of Waste Resources announced that it will be expanding the service hours of the household hazardous waste collection facilities at the landfills in Moreno Valley and Beaumont beginning on January 2, 2017.

These services are for Riverside County residents only, and are aimed at keeping household hazardous waste out of landfills. Waste from businesses or non-profits is not allowed.

From a Riverside County News Release:

The Riverside County Department of Waste Resources will expand the service collection days for the antifreeze, battery, oil, paint (ABOP) and PaintCare Facility from one day a week to 6 days each week, at the landfills in Moreno Valley and Beaumont. Beginning January 2, 2017, the newly expanded services will be available for free to Riverside County residents from 6 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except on holidays. The Badlands Landfill is located at 31125 Ironwood Ave. in Moreno Valley and the Lamb Canyon Landfill is located at 16411 Lamb Canyon Road in Beaumont.

The ABOP and PaintCare Facilities provide an opportunity for Riverside County residents to keep household hazardous waste out of landfills and ensure that it is properly managed.

The release states that typical waste accepted at these facilities “includes antifreeze, household and automotive batteries, used motor oil and oil filters, paints, cooking oil, aerosols, mercury containing equipment, fluorescent bulbs/tubes, and electronic wastes such as televisions, computers, VCRs and telephones”.

The release does not specifically mention old fuel. I have some to get rid of so I will to call to find out if they will accept it.

There are limits. No contaminated waste will be accepted, and loads must not exceed 15 gallons (in no more than 5 gallon containers) or 125 pounds (no more than 50 pounds per container) per vehicle.

For more information, view the news release and/or contact the department:

(951) 486-3200 or (800) 304-2226
http://www.rcwaste.org/hhw

Filed Under: Government, Uncategorized Tagged With: beaumont, inland empire, landfill, moreno valley, riverside, riverside california, trash, waste management

HUD Awards Almost $20 Million for Riverside and SB Homeless Programs

December 22, 2016 by Ole Leave a Comment

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced Tuesday that it has awarded almost $2 billion to over 7,000 homeless assistance organizations throughout the Country.

Combined, Riverside and San Bernardino organizations were awarded almost $20 million. To see the entire list, click here.

The following tables show the organizations in Riverside and San Bernardino (source: HUD)

 

CA-608 – Riverside City & County CoC
Behavioral Health – Coachella Valley Permanent Housing 498,468
Behavioral Health – Men’s Permanent Housing 149,366
Behavioral Health – Rapid Rehousing 142,117
Behavioral Health – Riverside Permanent Housing 359,743
Behavioral Health HHOPE Consolidated Permanent Housing 495,415
City of Riverside PSH Chronically Homeless 125,598
City of Riverside PSH for Disabled 123,556
City of Riverside Rapid Re-Housing 229,728
County of Riverside CES Project 500,000
County of Riverside CoC Planning Project FY 2016 315,901
Desert Horizon PSH 431,577
HMIS Consolidated 344,072
Housing Authority Consolidated 510,304
Housing Authority Consolidated All County 448,217
Housing Authority EHOP 42,739
Housing Authority Street to Home Chronic Homeless Project 114,993
JFS Desert Vista Permanent Housing 684,148
Lighthouse SSC Permanent Housing for Disabled Women with Children 232,149
Lighthouse SSC Rapid Rehousing 263,274
Path of Life PSH 1,314,354
Path of Life Rapid Rehousing 345,549
POLM RRH East County 377,260
Shelter Plus Care Project Based w/OSH 72,803
Stepping Up in Riverside 888,903
US Vets Riverside Permanent Housing 375,292
CA-608 Total $9,385,526
CA-609 – San Bernardino City & County CoC
2016 Fast Linkage And Secure Housing – 211 Coordinated Entry 403,136
CoC Planning Project Application FY2016 336,602
Cornerstone 400,415
HMIS Renewal 2016 250,158
Homes of Hope 361,001
Hope For Heroes 2 FY 2016 328,896
Hope for Heroes FY 2016 487,237
Hope Partners’ Family Stabilization Program 141,137
Infinite Horizons – RRH FY 2016 518,002
KEYS for Life 241,021
Keys for Success 285,480
Lantern Woods 225,214
Laurelbrook Estates 357,984
New Hope, Too! (2016) 39,145
New Horizon 1,865,076
Permanent Housing for Homeless with HIV/AIDS 76,455
Project Gateway 182,550
Step Up in San Bernardino Bonus Funds Application FY2016 361,002
Step Up in San Bernardino Renewal FY2016 1,544,888
Stepping Stones 331,739
TAY Permanent Supportive Housing 187,011
The Salvation Army Permanent Supportive Housing Program 200,002
U.S.VETS – Inland Empire Renewal FY2016 1,021,292
Whispering Pines 194,141
CA-609 Total $10,339,584

Filed Under: Government, People Tagged With: city of riverside, homeless services, inland empire, riverside, riverside california, riverside county, san bernardino, san bernardino county

“A” Street / Citrus Heights Drive Update: Nov-16

November 21, 2016 by Ole Leave a Comment

Update #1: Unofficially, I have heard that paving might begin the week after Thanksgiving.
Update #2: I have heard from the County that paving is scheduled to begin on 11/28/16, with an expected opening date of 1/1/17.
Update #3: Paving has begun…

"A" Street / Citrus Heights Drive

———————————————
Some pictures of “A” Street / Citrus Heights Drive in the City of Riverside, California from a few days ago…

"A" Street / Citrus Heights Drive

"A" Street / Citrus Heights Drive

"A" Street / Citrus Heights Drive

"A" Street / Citrus Heights Drive

Looks to me like paving can’t be too far off. I will update this post with new pictures if paving begins this month. I have also sent an email to the County to get an update on the current estimated completion date.

Filed Under: Government, Public Works, Traffic Tagged With: a street, citrus heights drive, city of riverside, dufferin closure, inland empire, inland empire hiking, riverside, riverside california, riverside hiking

“A” Street / Citrus Heights Drive Update: Aug-16

August 17, 2016 by Ole Leave a Comment

Driving down Van Buren today, my wife noticed this:

Street "A" / Citrus Heights Drive?

We both thought that this might be the spot where Citrus Heights Drive FKA Fairway Drive FKA Street “A” ends at Van Buren.

I went back later this afternoon and walked up into the hills to check on the progress of the road. Here are some pictures:

The beginning at McAllister:

Citrus Heights Drive Construction - Aug-16

Near the middle:

Citrus Heights Drive Construction - Aug-16

Citrus Heights Drive Construction - Aug-16

What looks like the end at Van Buren:

Citrus Heights Drive Construction - Aug-16

Moving along.

Filed Under: Government, Public Works, Traffic Tagged With: a street, citrus heights, citrus heights drive, dufferin closure, fairway drive

“A” Street / Citrus Heights Drive Update: Jul-16

July 6, 2016 by Ole Leave a Comment

It has been almost seven years since the City of Riverside closed Dufferin Avenue at McAllister Parkway.

Since then, affected residents have been waiting for construction of an alternate route (“A” Street) between McAllister Parkway and Van Buren Blvd. “A” Street was supposed to be completed prior to the closure.

In my last update, I shared some info from the County about the construction of “A” Street. At the time, the estimated completion date was July 2016.

According to the County, the new estimate is December 2016. It seems that the new name of the road will be Citrus Heights Drive.

I decided to venture out early this morning to check on the progress.

Looking southwest toward Citrus Heights / McAllister:

"A" Street - 07/06/2016

Looking northeast toward Van Buren:

"A" Street - 07/06/2016

Visit the following link to see past and future updates: dufferin closure.

** Update: I have been told that the delay was due to the discovery of an “un-mapped gas line and several boulder structures which set their timetable back by 5 months”. I have also “heard” (not directly from the County) that the estimated completion date might be closer to mid-2017, although the estimated completion date I received directly from the County is December 2016. Regardless of which estimate is more accurate, I will continue to check on the progress as we near the end of the year. **

Filed Under: Government, Public Works, Traffic Tagged With: a street, citrus heights drive, dufferin closure, fairway drive

“A” Street / Fairway Drive Update: Feb-16

February 26, 2016 by Ole 5 Comments

Update from the County:

Contract awarded.
Preconstruction meeting Monday.
Work to begin in 10 days.
Estimated completion July 2016.

** Additional Info 02/28/16 **

I have been asked if I know where Fairway Drive will connect with McAllister and Van Buren. I will try to find a better answer, but here is my best guess: (I created this image by laying a map from this 2014 County document over a map from Google Maps.)

Street A / Fairway Drive Google Maps Overlay

Filed Under: Government, Public Works, Traffic Tagged With: a street, dufferin closure, fairway drive

California Traffic Ticket Amnesty Starts Tomorrow, Oct 1, 2015

September 30, 2015 by Ole Leave a Comment

Darn. I already paid my tickets.

Here is an excerpt from the California Judicial Branch‘s website: (If this applies to you, make sure you read the full document)

On June 24, 2015, the Governor signed into law a one-time amnesty program for unpaid traffic and non-traffic infraction tickets. Here is what you should know:

When will the amnesty program be available?
Start: October 1, 2015
End: March 31, 2017

Who can participate in the amnesty program?
There are two groups of people who can participate in the amnesty program:

  • Persons with unpaid tickets whose fines were originally due to be paid date on or before January 1, 2013, who have not made a payment after June 24, 2015, may be eligible to have both their debt reduced by 50 or 80 percent depending on income and their driver’s license reinstated, unless an exclusion discussed below applies.
  • Persons who made a payment after June 24, 2015 on a ticket are not eligible for a reduction for that ticket, but may be eligible to have their driver’s license reinstated if they are in good standing on a payment plan with a comprehensive collection program.
    Persons with more than one ticket may not be eligible for a reduction on an individual ticket if the eligibility criteria are not satisfied for the ticket. Please check with your court for additional information.
  • Any persons eligible to have a driver’s license, (including undocumented individuals who are eligible for a driver’s license under AB 60) are entitled to participate in the traffic amnesty program if they meet the eligibility requirements.

[…]

Source: http://www.courts.ca.gov/trafficamnesty.htm

Filed Under: Government, Traffic

“A” Street / Fairway Drive / Citrus Heights Update, Jul-15

July 12, 2015 by Ole Leave a Comment

Although the proceedings aren’t posted on the County’s website as of the time I am writing this, I received word that Citrus Heights II was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 30th.

citrus-iandii-vicinity-20150513-The Citrus Heights II tract is just south of the previously approved Citrus Heights development referenced in a previous post.

I have also been told that this development will provide the final portion of funding for Street “A”, although the County is still working to acquire a few of the properties needed to construct the street.

** Update 07/15/15 **

This is a picture of an exhibit from Riverside County’s La Sierra / Lake Mathews town hall meeting on 07/14/15 confirming the current status of “A” Street:

IMG_9004-5-20150714-town-hall-u

** End of update **

From agenda item 16-1 of the Riverside County Board of Supervisor’s June 30, 2015 meeting:

Tentative Tract Map No. 36475 would construct several public roadways on the site. Access to the Project site would be provided via two (2) full access connections from an approved, neighboring development project to the north (TR 36390, marketing name “Citrus Heights”). From Citrus Heights, Project residents would have direct connections to McAllister Street and Street “A”. Street “A” is also known as “Fairway Drive”, an approved public street that will provide a connection between McAllister Street and Van Buren Boulevard. In 2012 the Board of Supervisors authorized Fast Track status to the adjacent SP325 and this project site in recognition that both projects are causing the construction of Street “A”, which will not only provide access to these projects but which also greatly benefits the adjacent communities of Victoria Grove, the Orchard, and other properties around McAllister Street by bringing a connection to Van Buren Blvd.

Information on Citrus Heights II from the same document:

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36475 is a Schedule “A” subdivision of 168.33 acres into 171 residential lots on 79.83 acres, two water quality/detention basins on 5.26 acres, four park sites on 3.78 acres, and 21 open space lots encompassing 50.56 acres. In addition, 29.31 acres will be dedicated for on-site infrastructure development (Streets “A” through “R”). Lot sizes for the proposed residential units will range from 14,010 sq. ft. to 116,073 sq. ft. with a minimum lot size of 12,101 sq. ft.

citrus-heights-ii-map-tract36475-20150513-

Previous posts about the Dufferin Closure, “A” Street / Fairway Drive and Citrus Heights topics can be found by clicking on the “dufferin closure” tag.

Filed Under: Government, Public Works, Traffic Tagged With: a street, citrus heights, dufferin closure, fairway drive

“A” Street / Dufferin Update, Jan-15; Public Hearing on 01/13/15

January 11, 2015 by Ole 4 Comments

03-03001-map

** UPDATE 01/13/15 **

At the public hearing this morning, the Board voted 4-0 to approve the resolution.

According to Transportation Director Perez, the road is expected to cost “in the neighborhood of about $8 million”, the cost of which will be “borne by private development”.

*******************

On January 13, 2015, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors will hold a “Public Hearing on Adoption of Resolution No. 2015-002, Authorization to Adopt a Resolution of Necessity for the Street A Improvement Project”. According to the agenda, the meeting begins at 9:00 AM. The hearing is agenda item 9-2.

If you aren’t familiar with the Street A / A Street project, here is some background from the Submittal to the Board of Supervisors (you can also review the numerous posts we have written about the Dufferin closure and A Street project here: dufferin-closure):

The Street A Project is a proposed two lane collector road connecting McAllister Parkway to Van Buren Boulevard, of which 40 percent is located within the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside (County) and 60 percent is located within the jurisdiction of the City of Riverside (City).

In 2006, the County approved Tract 30153 (McAllister Hills), which would have constructed a golf course residential community development. The County required this tract to construct a new road between McAllister Street and Van Buren Boulevard, referred to as Street A, which would serve traffic from the development and provide an alternate access route for residents of Victoria Grove, The Orchards, and other communities in the area north of El Sobrante and east of La Sierra Avenue.

[…]

The road design was nearly complete and right-of-way was about to commence in 2008 when work ceased on the developer’s project, which went into foreclosure due to the economic downturn.

[…]

Since that time, the community desires to see Street A move forward ahead of development due to the closure of the extension of McAllister north into the City of Riverside, which was done by the City in 2009.

[…]

The Project is a critical circulation and emergency access link for the communities of The Orchard, Victoria Grove and other developments located east of La Sierra Avenue, and north of El Sobrante.

What is a resolution of necessity? I’ll let a lawyer answer that question. From http://www.eminentdomainlaw.net/handbook2_6.php:

A “resolution of necessity” is the government agency’s formal decision to acquire property by eminent domain. It must be adopted before the condemning agency can commence an eminent domain action in court.

Why is a resolution of necessity required for this project? From the Submittal:

The Economic Development Agency/Facilities Management (EDA/FM) has presented written offers to the property owners as required by Government Code Section 7267.2. The amount of the offers is consistent with current property values in the Woodcrest area and is based upon a fair market value appraisal report.

[…]

The Project consists of six property owners; two of which have settled. However, settlement has not been reached with the remaining four property owners, although negotiations are still in process for the necessary right-of-way

How would this be paid for? From the Submittal:

All costs associated with the acquisition of these properties are fully funded by Developer Contributions in the Transportation Department’s budget for FY 2014/15. No net county costs will be incurred as a result of this transaction.

Filed Under: Government, Traffic Tagged With: a street, dufferin closure, riverside

People Actually Voted for Indicted State Senator Leland Yee Yesterday?

June 4, 2014 by Ole Leave a Comment

Notice anything odd about the Secretary of State election results from yesterday?

20140603electionresultsstatesos

Check out who finished in third place with almost 10% of the statewide vote. Leland Yee.  Why should you care?

  1. Leland Yee dropped out of the race.
  2. Leland Yee was indicted earlier this year after being “charged with conspiring to traffic in firearms and public corruption”.

Leland Yee’s indictment was a big story, and was difficult to miss if you watched or read any type of news at the time. Why was it such big news?

  1. Political Corruption: Leland Yee (D) is a (now suspended) California State Senator from San Francisco.
  2. Hypocrisy: Leland Yee is a gun control advocate.
  3. Firepower: Firearms discussed in the criminal complaint include “shoulder fired missiles“.

Maybe all of the votes came from people in San Francisco who were just used to seeing his name on the ballot. Nope. Over 11,000 people voted for him in Riverside County alone.

20140603electionresultsrivsos

When you exercise your right to vote, please research the candidates and the issues. Rather than voting for a person we know nothing about simply because there is an “R” or a “D” next to the candidate’s name, or voting for/against an issue based on the opinion of a commentator, radio host, political party, organization, family member or friend, we need to do our homework and make our own informed decisions.

Leland Yee got almost 290,000 votes yesterday. Really California?

Filed Under: Government, Politics Tagged With: leland yee, political corruption

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

This website is not my day job. It is a labor of love. If this website is helpful, please show your appreciation by leaving a comment, sharing a post, clicking an interesting ad or liking/following one of my social media accounts. Thank you, Ole.

Archives

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2023 · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service